In conclusion Content that has been relevant was found to rank greater than that which did not cover a subject in depth. One of their findings was that longer content ranked higher in search results. In fact, the length of the top 5 content has been 1890 words. Just as the studies that are various have different decisions on the word count, the agreement is that content will rank higher. From the angle of this time a user takes to absorb the material (dwell time), 7 min seems to be the minimum. Is content length is essential for top ranking on search engines? Another study by Can I Rank also showed that higher content ranked higher, just as this research by SerpIQ and Moz. As an example, you may examine the best 10 results in your niche, and attempt to get an average of the length. You might use a keyword that is particular to do a little analysis of the same. When there are no requirements from Google. What's it really that produces long content rank higher?
Relevance -- There's a higher likelihood that longer content tends to cover a subject in-depth, which makes it more applicable. Google will rank content that is relevant higher, and content also results in bounce rates.
User intention -- more content also tends to serve user intent better when compared to shorter content pieces. If a user wants to purchase fishing gear for example, a long article or video which covers all the aspects of excellent fishing gear, where to purchase, the way to understand the best equipment to buy, questions to ask a supplier before purchasing, and goes on to compare different brands is highly inclined to serve that user's intent than a shorter piece of material.
Worth -- the truth is that when it comes to content length, visitors may spend a substantial amount of time consuming a part of content filled with fluff, or that utilizes complex sentence structure, and redundant examples, in a bid to have the gist. These visitors aren't very likely to return to that website after this kind of experience. The value in a particular piece of content things.
Message -- the message you want to place across decides how long the piece of content should be. There's absolutely no need to force long content, if the message is short. The area where redundancy comes in, this is. You have for example read posts on how a company changed its model and obtained an increase in CTR. Content will likely be self-focused, and offer value if any. It'd have been better if simple, practical steps had been extracted by them from their narrative and generated articles. The message, in this case, is short, there's no need to belabor the point.
Content length and niche
What then does content length then refer to?
Length is the sum of time when swallowing a part of content a user will spend. While there are many studies to demonstrate that the length of content matters for ranking, shareability, and traffic, Rand Fishkin attracts another view to the whole discussion. According to his point of view, it's good to consider factors such as if the articles is in precisely the exact same niche examined targets audiences similar to yours and uses keywords which you might be targeting. Here of a good content length as our indicator at SEOptimer we utilize' 500 words' according to research and studies. We have looked at long-form articles, what it means, and why it ranks. Having content is inadequate on its own. Make sure that the message therein needs to be packed in long-form content and that it is relevant, has worth, matches with user intent. It may help to consider the view of Rand Fishkin too. You can use a tool like Ahrefs to perform a mini-analysis if your niche is not contained here. You will see the hottest material for that keyword and phrase count for each link, if you go in a key word: How Long Should Your Posts Be for SEO? In 2016, Backlinko completed a study to recognize the things that correlate with search results that rank on the first page. Some Low quality webpages are unsatisfying because they have a small sum of MC for the purpose of the page. By way of example, imagine an encyclopedia article with only a few paragraphs on a subject including World War II. Significant: An unsatisfying amount of MC is a sufficient reason to give a page a Low quality score . According to several studies done over the previous 6 years, longer content appears to rank greater when compared to content that is shorter. Different men and women give different explanations as to why this could occur. Let us get more into this. What do we mean by content length? Does it refer to the amount of images, words or graphics? Can a long video mean that it packs more worth than even a 1 minute movie or the usual 5 minute? The inverse may be true. A longer piece of content (in relation to the number of words, pictures, or period in the case of video) might have more space for redundancy. A movie may, for instance, start by greetings, an introduction of the team, an introduction to the content, not to mention the usual"please subscribe" message.